Deal’s budget cuts will trim health programs

Print Friendly and PDF By: Andy Miller Published: Jan 12, 2011

Gov. Nathan Deal’s budget proposals, unveiled Wednesday, contain financial pain for Georgians in government insurance programs and those who treat them.

Medical providers such as physicians will receive a 1 percent cut in payments for treating Medicaid and PeachCare patients in fiscal 2012. That reduction, which does not affect hospitals, was not as harsh as anticipated.

But Medicaid beneficiaries will face higher co-pays, and adults in the program will lose vision, dental and podiatry benefits. Parents of children in the PeachCare program for uninsured kids will be required to pay co-pays for the first time. These changes will create barriers to needed care, consumer advocates warned.

Deal’s first State of the State address Wednesday focused on budgets for the current fiscal year and fiscal 2012, which begins in July. He also criticized federal health care reform legislation in his speech to Georgia lawmakers.

The reform law, Deal said, “will greatly add to the burden that we face. In fact, it will add approximately 650,000 Georgians to the Medicaid rolls. This mandated expansion of service will cost Georgia Medicaid an additional $2.5 billion in state funds alone over the next ten years.’’

Deal complained about federal requirements that don’t allow the state to change its eligibility rules for people to enroll in Medicaid. ‘’Left unaddressed, we expect to see patient access to care severely limited and an overall erosion of the high-quality care that our state prides itself upon,’’ Deal said.

One health care arena came out way ahead in the Deal budgets: Georgians needing mental health or developmental disabilities services will see a big increase in funding for community programs, under the state Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. That change stems from a settlement that the state reached with the U.S. Department of Justice last year.

Under the DOJ accord, Georgia promised to deliver $77 million in new funding to help people with disabilities avoid institutionalization by offering more community alternatives such as housing and crisis teams.

“It’s a good amount of money,’’ said Ellyn Jeager, director of public policy and advocacy for Mental Health America of Georgia. “Now the department must be sure that it’s spent in the most appropriate way to get the best outcome.’’

Public health, though, appeared to be a major budget loser. Public health services take an $8.7 million cut in state funding, or a 6 percent reduction, said Tim Sweeney, senior health care analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute (GBPI). That decrease comes on top of public health cutbacks in previous years.

Deal, in his address, also vowed to eliminate 14,000 government positions overall, and state health agencies will bear their share of those cuts.

The budget documents project a decrease of about 250 jobs in the Department of Community Health, which runs Medicaid and PeachCare, and about 770 positions in the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities.

Behavioral Health spokesman Tom Wilson said the job cuts there will reflect reductions in state psychiatric hospital employment in the coming year as community services increase. “For instance, by June 30 of this year we’ll stop admitting any new people to state hospitals whose primary diagnosis is a developmental disability,’’ Wilson said. “At the same time, we’re transitioning out 150 people with developmental disabilities by July,’’ he said.

The budget shows state employees and teachers in the state’s health benefit plan will face a 10 percent hike in insurance premiums in 2012, mirroring one that took effect this year.

The unexpectedly small cut in Medicaid payments to physicians and other medical professionals was welcome news, said Jimmy Lewis, CEO of HomeTown Health, an organization of rural hospitals in the state. “It’s pretty clear that [Deal] acknowledges some of the access and funding problems we’ve had in the Medicaid program. He has attempted to protect access to care and providers as much as possible.’’

Sweeney of GBPI said, “Hopefully, medical providers can handle a 1 percent cut, and we won’t see a reduction in access.’’

Still, Cindy Zeldin of the consumer group Georgians for a Healthy Future predicted that the Medicaid rate cut, the new PeachCare co-pays, increased Medicaid co-pays and the elimination of some Medicaid benefits ‘’will all negatively impact access to care.’’

“Eliminating basic services like dental and podiatry can lead to greater medical problems that could have been treated early on,’’ said Zeldin. She said the government should look for ways to increase revenues to prevent such health care reductions.

Related posts:

  1. Providers to face brunt of Medicaid cuts
  2. Next DCH chief will have huge health care role
  3. The new guv’s health care challenges
  4. 2010′s Top Health Care Stories in Georgia
  5. Medicare pay cuts to doctors raise alarm bells
  • Joyce Deal

    I can’t beleive all these budget cuts on people who really need services. You should try cutting some of the pay raises the government officials give themselves instead of cutting jobs and services for the poor working folks. Look at actual incomes for these people. Their salaries are within the poverty level, but they are at least working and trying to pay their bills. Personally, I retired and am on social security, get a small retirement from the state, but had to go back to work part-time to keep my bills paid. Some of us are doing all we can to keep our heads above water. Please don’t cut any more services. Especially not to Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. These are the people who need help the most.

  • Gracie Smith

    Cut backs are a great thing. A single person born in 1960 who earns close to median wages over their lifetime is scheduled to receive approximately $250,000 in lifetime Social Security benefits. Chances are they did not pay in but a few thousand dollars into the SSI pot. If that person dies, then the spouse can receive SSI off the wage earner. A parent of mine, worked for three years during WW2, quit work when she married, took SSI at age of 62 from my father, and has received SSI, Medicare, Food assistance and Medicaid supplement for 27 years. How can the system not go broke? The tax payers have been supplementing her living for 27years.

    Now we as a society expect to physicians to keep patients alive that need to expire gracefully. One more MIR, one more CT scan has put our society into financial ruins. Physicians and other medical professionals need to be more active with palliative care and hospice care. Premature babies are kept alive and are doomed with complications, perhaps involving the brain, will almost certainly face life-long disability issues. We as a society need to stop playing God and let God handle his exclusive domain.

    Teen childbearing in the United States costs taxpayers (federal, state, and local) at least $9.1 billion. Why not require the parents to serve in the military to pay back some of the money taxpayers paid for the prenatal and deliver of their baby. Charging the parents of a teenage pregnant child with child abuse and a fine would also help recover losses.

    Open long term facilities for mental health patients would get them off the streets and into a controlled and safer environment, saving taxpayers money for medical and legal expense.

    • bruce

      Brother died at 49 ,mom 55, dad 60. It was imposiable for the system to run out of money. More people and living longer is nothing but a lie . soc.sec. had money issues in the past ,Why”THAT’S WHERE NEARLY ALL THE MONEY CAME FROM FOR A TEN YEAR WAR CALLED VIETNAM !!
      We still are taking money from it to. Every one adds to this nation . even if they don’t put a dime in. We the people as as community ,accept that,some well put more or less in. If were keeping score, why are we doing tax deferments (401k) , buy a house you write off the taxes, have a kid write that off. 30-40 years of these write offs. so that you don’t need the goverment to provide . With those write offs you can buy the best most expessive care there is and live to 90. Do you? NO. People think that money’s to pass on to there children. WRONG. Your kids well have the same bail outs,tax cuts what ever you what to call it, as you. Not one person saying they want a smaller goverment are welling to hand over there Medicare card. yet, with the freeby,and major tax write offs. they hord that money. we been supplementing you for all your working span. You think disable people such as myself want that little bit of nothing. All the programs you said are nothing on our budget compared to what we allow so call self rightous people like you, that think poor pitfull me Im the only one supporting every one else. If you don’t like paying for a few that don’t put as much in. Go to a third world country. Your wish granted, tit for tat.They got just what you all want smaller gov. yep, no highways, schools soc. sec. medicare etc,etc,.I hope I can pull the plug on you. Hangin there your day well come when you need these things. you look only two inches in front of your face.

  • BarbP

    Most people who speak ill of the elderly, low income and handicaped have not yet experienced it. Though I have drawn a small pension and a very small SS payment (less than $400.00) a month for three years I worked and paid into the system 45 years. I really doubt I will live long enough to gough the system out of more money than they got out of my wages unless I make it to 103. I survive very frugally and live differently than when I worked full time. I doubt if a government official has ever had to say that or ever will.

    I, for one, would have not let my mother die because she should “expire gracefully” if a test or medication would give her 20 more years of life……which it did after her first heart attack at the age of 60 and subsequent strokes. We are quickly becoming a greedy, self preservation above all else, country with money taking more presidence than human life, education or compassion for the working poor, the aged and the less fortunate.
    Shame on us.

  • Related posts

    1. Providers to face brunt of Medicaid cuts
    2. Next DCH chief will have huge health care role
    3. The new guv’s health care challenges
    4. 2010′s Top Health Care Stories in Georgia
    5. Medicare pay cuts to doctors raise alarm bells